I think White's fighting for survival so how about 1. Qh6 intending Bg5 and Bf6? If Black plays 1... Nxf3 there's 2. Rxg6+ fg 3. Qxg6+. However, I thinking I'm running out of checks after Kf8 (3... Kh8 4. Qh6+ Kg8 5. Qg6+ ...) 4. Qf6+ Ke8 5. Bh6 Bc8 (possibly 5... Nf2+ will come to something) 6. Bf8 Kd7 7. Qe7+ Kc6 8. Qxd6+ ...
I went for h5 to soften up the kingside. I wanted to go f4, but think Black gets a nice position by sacrificing the piece with Bc6. The hope with h5 is that Black struggles to break through as quickly with his knight tied to defending g6.
"By isolating the basic elements of master and grandmaster games, Simple Chess attempts to break down the mystique of chess strategy into plain, clear, easy-to-understand ideas." Michael Stean
"Why is Black lost? Material is equal and White hasn’t got a piece beyond the second rank. The answer lies in the pawns. White has two beautiful squares on c4 and d5 plus a mobile pawn roller on the left flank, whereas Black’s pawns constrict his own pieces terribly, particularly the bishop." Michael Stean
If each player is capable of quick development, castling and of not blundering any pieces away, what is there to separate the two sides? This is the starting point of Simple Chess . - Michael Stean
I think White's fighting for survival so how about 1. Qh6 intending Bg5 and Bf6? If Black plays 1... Nxf3 there's 2. Rxg6+ fg 3. Qxg6+. However, I thinking I'm running out of checks after Kf8 (3... Kh8 4. Qh6+ Kg8 5. Qg6+ ...) 4. Qf6+ Ke8 5. Bh6 Bc8 (possibly 5... Nf2+ will come to something) 6. Bf8 Kd7 7. Qe7+ Kc6 8. Qxd6+ ...
ReplyDeleteHi Angus,
DeleteYup White is struggling. I’ll reply to 1 Qh6 in the feedback post.
I went for h5 to soften up the kingside. I wanted to go f4, but think Black gets a nice position by sacrificing the piece with Bc6. The hope with h5 is that Black struggles to break through as quickly with his knight tied to defending g6.
ReplyDeleteh5 was my choice too. I also started with f4 - but see the feedback post for why it doesn’t work (i’d not seen it either).
Delete