BtM 2A: Blitz chess and me are no longer friends

August 1988, Position G


Black to play
Nogueiras - Tal, Brussels World Cup 1988


Contributions are welcome in the comments box. I’ll reply with what the Masters have to say about their choice to anybody who suggests a move.

Scroll down when you’re ready to see what the Beat the Masters panel chose and the points scored for each move.


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.





Today’s position is not, I think, a good one for Beat the Masters.  It’s not that there are fewer pieces on the board than normal. The occasional endgame or near endgame set-up makes for good variety. The problem is the nature of the position.

First of all, there’s one move that’s clearly better than all the others. Which would be fine, but when the entire panel chooses the same move, as they did here, it rather negates the object of the exercise.

The second problem is that you can choose the move and get the full 10 points (as I did) whether or not you see the tactical point on the next move (as I didn’t).

So, no, I don’t think it’s a great example of the series. I’m including it here because my thinking about this position does rather show why playing blitz is so frustrating for me (spoiler: it’s because I’m rubbish at it).



I started off by reviewing the position. I saw that I  - Black - was a pawn up, that I had two connected passed pawns on the queenside, that my pieces were centralised, that I could take on either e6 or f5 … but I also thought that White’s knight looked very dangerous. Much too close to my king for my liking.

My first idea, then, was to try to swap everything off on e6. I calculated this far:-

1 … Nxe6, 2 Rxe6 Rxe6, 3 fxe6 Qxe6, 4 Qd8+ Kf7, 5 Rd7+ Kg6 and saw that after 6 Rd6 I was going to lose my queen.

I was going to move on to something else when I realised I had some checks so I went further down  this line …

6 … Rc1+, 7 Kf2 Rc2+, 8 Kg3 Rc3+, 9 Kh4 Rc4+ . At this point I realised that White could hide with 10 g4 and I was going to give up on the line again but then I realised that I still had a check. I thought that after 10 … Rxg4+, 11 Kh3 would be forced after which I’d have a discovered check. 11 … Rd4+ and then White takes my queen but that’s alright because I then reply with … RxQ myself and I would end up with two connected passed pawns up in a rook ending. Job’s a good un’.

Except I realised immediately that this is nonsense because White would take my queen with check. So, in fact, taking three times on e6 would be a forced loss.

Now, calculating a dozen moves ahead is far more than I can usually manage. The lack of time pressure, not to mention the reduced material and the fact it was all checks and captures, helped a lot. Still, I was pleased that I could accurately visualise the position that far in advance.

Nevertheless, the line didn’t work so I started to consider 1 … Qxf5.

And then - this was about 9 minutes after I started - I finally noticed that the rook on c5 was attacked.

Incredible. I could accurately calculate a long line but I could’t see what was literally sitting there in front of me.

And that’s why I can’t really get my COVID chess fix playing blitz online. I can play reasonably well at times, but these days it’s only in phases. Sooner or later I usually end up blundering away a piece or more because I just didn’t see something was hanging. Which is all rather frustrating.

As we’ve seen, I still make these absurd oversights when I’m looking at Beat the Masters positions. The difference is it doesn’t ruin the experience. With these exercises when the penny finally drops that I’m hallucination, roll eyes at myself and just carry on. No harm done.

Which is so much more fun than trying and failing to play blitz.


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


POINTS

10: … Rxf5
5:  … Ra5
4:  … Rcc8
2:  … Nxe6



MASTERS

10 … Rxf5: IM Kosten, GM Plaskett, IM Davies, GM Flear, IM P. Littlewood, IM Norwood, IM Conquest, IM Levitt, IM K. Arkell, IM Howell, IM Martin, IM Botterill, IWM S. Arkell



SOURCE
Nogueiras - Tal, Brussels World Cup 1988
Move chosen: 25 ... Rxf5

Comments

  1. Not sure what’s going on with the font size in this post - I’ll try to fix things by Monday when BtM3 comes out

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nogueiras - Tal went 1 ... Rxf5, 2 Nd8 Rd5 and White resigned.

    George Botterill says ... Rd5 is "appreciably more convicing than 2 ... Rxe1+, 3 Rxe1 Qd5, 4 Qxd5 Rxd5, 5 Re8"

    He also prefers 2 Nd4 or 2 Nf8 Rxf8, 3 Qb3! to White’s final move which he says is a blunder - albeit that White might have struggled on rather than resign

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Simple Chess